Consider using podman in our install script. #2637
Labels
feedback: captured
Feedback in issue has been captured
ready
Ready for implementation
restricted: maintainers
Only maintainers can resolve this issue
type: enhancement
New feature or request
user reported
Reported by a Mathesar user
work: installation
Milestone
Comments
kgodey
added
ready
1 task
|
I want to work on this issue. |
|
@NeerajGartia21 This is restricted to maintainers, sorry. |
|
Based on prior discussions we've been having regarding installation, I don't think we're planning to modify the install script to use podman. #2783 should take care of running the docker image directly and users would be able to be use podman if they want to. It's unreleated to this issue, since this one explicitly mentions modifying the install script. Should we close this issue? @kgodey @silentninja |
|
This issue has not been updated in 90 days and is being marked as stale. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In #2427 (comment), @hrj pointed out that we can use podman to avoid asking for super user permission in the install script.
Avoiding superuser permissions seems like a great idea! We should investigate and update the script if podman will work for our needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: