Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed the 'group' suffix in Data Explorer #3357

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

ishir21
Copy link
Contributor

@ishir21 ishir21 commented Dec 18, 2023

Fixes #2333

When Summarizing in Data Explorer , the grouping column gets a default group suffix appended, I have removed the suffix as discussed in the issue.
Technical details

Screenshots

Checklist

  • My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update index.md).
  • My pull request targets the develop branch of the repository
  • My commit messages follow best practices.
  • My code follows the established code style of the repository.
  • I added tests for the changes I made (if applicable).
  • I added or updated documentation (if applicable).
  • I tried running the project locally and verified that there are no
    visible errors.

Developer Certificate of Origin

Developer Certificate of Origin
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.

@sangramrajekakade
Copy link

sangramrajekakade commented Dec 18, 2023 via email

@seancolsen seancolsen added the pr-status: review A PR awaiting review label Dec 18, 2023
@seancolsen seancolsen added this to the Backlog milestone Dec 18, 2023
@ishir21
Copy link
Contributor Author

ishir21 commented Jan 3, 2024

@Anish9901 any updates?

@Anish9901
Copy link
Member

Hey @ishir21, sorry that it's taking this long for me to review your PR, actually we are in the middle of making a release and therefore, haven't got to taking a look at your PR yet. I'll go through it as soon as possible.

@seancolsen
Copy link
Contributor

@Anish9901 can you try to move this along?

@kgodey
Copy link
Contributor

kgodey commented Apr 4, 2024

I put this in 0.1.7 so it's clearer that this should be prioritized.

@@ -446,5 +446,4 @@ def _get_default_display_name_for_group_output_alias(
.map_of_output_alias_to_input_alias[output_alias]
input_alias_display_name = current_display_names.get(input_alias)
if input_alias_display_name:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ishir21 This if statement is unnecessary and can be removed, you can directly return input_alias_display_name.

@Anish9901 Anish9901 assigned ishir21 and unassigned Anish9901 Apr 5, 2024
@Anish9901 Anish9901 added pr-status: revision A PR awaiting follow-up work from its author after review and removed pr-status: review A PR awaiting review labels Apr 5, 2024
@kgodey
Copy link
Contributor

kgodey commented Apr 5, 2024

Since this is in the next release and it's been open for so long, @Anish9901 please make the necessary changes yourself if you don't hear from @ishir21 by mid-next week.

@ishir21
Copy link
Contributor Author

ishir21 commented Apr 6, 2024

@Anish9901 I have made the changes

@Anish9901
Copy link
Member

@ishir21, I see that some of the Python tests in the CI are failing due to the changes made in the PR, Can you fix them so that they match the intended behavior?

Copy link
Member

@Anish9901 Anish9901 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution @ishir21! I pushed a commit(fcfd190) to fix the breaking tests, so, that we could include this PR in this month's release.

@Anish9901 Anish9901 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into mathesar-foundation:develop with commit 8a1b505 Apr 11, 2024
36 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-status: revision A PR awaiting follow-up work from its author after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When summarizing in Data Explorer, the grouping column should keep its name.
5 participants