Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assistive-Explorer.js explorer or walker? #115

Closed
pkra opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Assistive-Explorer.js explorer or walker? #115

pkra opened this issue May 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@pkra
Copy link
Contributor

pkra commented May 30, 2016

We sometimes call it walker, sometimes explorer. Should these be identical? If so, we should decide on a unique name.

@pkra pkra added the question label May 30, 2016
@pkra
Copy link
Contributor Author

pkra commented May 30, 2016

In particular, the extension is called Explorer but the relevant option is walker.

Since the extension provides much more, perhaps it should be named differently.

@dpvc
Copy link
Member

dpvc commented May 31, 2016

Actually, the extension is called "Explore" not "Explorer", though I think the latter is better. I prefer "Explorer" to "Walker", but am not adamant about it.

@pkra
Copy link
Contributor Author

pkra commented May 31, 2016

As per my own suggestion at #117 (comment), I created https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax-RespEq/wiki/Harmonizing-naming

@dpvc
Copy link
Member

dpvc commented May 31, 2016

Thanks. That should be a good basis for discussion on our next call.

@pkra pkra closed this as completed Jun 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants