What is outstanding for 1.0.0?

[JKSnd]

Its not clear what is in the way of bringing mathnet-spatial out of pre-release status.
I'm using it in a couple projects at the moment, and am presonally quite satisfied with it.

If I had insight into what is holding back rolling over to v1.0.0, I might be inclined to help take down some issues.

[JohanLarsson]

CoordinateSystem should be rewritten as struct for performance, the current implementation is likely pretty slow. The entire API around coordinate system should be improved.
Originally I wrote it to have a similar API to the coordinate system class in Autodesk Invetor. I remember that I have not been happy with it at all.

Also we should try to add some more documentation for methods, help from a native speaker would be greatly appreciated.

That is just from the top of my head not having used spatial much the last two years or so.

[cdrnet]

I've dropped the prerelease marker for the v0.3.0 release, so it is no longer technically a prerelease (although by convention 0.x versions are still exempt from some strict semantic versioning rules).

[JohanLarsson]

Perfect!

[JKSnd]

Thanks!

All's fair in love and 0.x.x

Jules

On Nov 5, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Johan Larsson <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Perfect!

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/48#issuecomment-258640325, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQ8zjruRwTd5gvEnDET8dTBpCq0CRN5uks5q7O5xgaJpZM4KfIRd.