We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
setup.py currently contains the lines
classifiers = [ <...> 'License :: OSI Approved :: Python Software Foundation License', <...> ]
and
license="BSD",
which are in contradiction with one another. (Considering the actual contents of the LICENSE file, I think the second instance should be changed to license="PSF".) See also https://packaging.python.org/specifications/core-metadata/#license for the metadata spec.
license="PSF"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They are all at least in the same family (see for JDH's motivations https://matplotlib.org/devel/license.html#license-discussion) .....
Sorry, something went wrong.
I don't actually personally care much, but thought you might.
Yeah, I have been reading licensing things for the last 30 minutes....
0b7089e
tacaswell
No branches or pull requests
setup.py currently contains the lines
and
which are in contradiction with one another. (Considering the actual contents of the LICENSE file, I think the second instance should be changed to
license="PSF"
.)See also https://packaging.python.org/specifications/core-metadata/#license for the metadata spec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: