Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify a bit the implementation of blend_hsv. #13726

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 25, 2019

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Mar 21, 2019

Introducing additional variables (hue, sat, val) makes it easier to
follow what's happening (imo).

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

Introducing additional variables (hue, sat, val) makes it easier to
follow what's happening (imo).
np.putmask(val, intensity > 0,
(1 - intensity) * val + intensity * hsv_max_val)
np.putmask(val, intensity < 0,
(1 + intensity) * val - intensity * hsv_min_val)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these ops modifying hsv in place? Or do you have to re-assemble hsv?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is indeed modifying hsv in place.

@jklymak jklymak merged commit 35dc7c8 into matplotlib:master Mar 25, 2019
@anntzer anntzer deleted the blend_hsv branch March 25, 2019 13:57
@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Mar 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants