Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TST: Add some tests for QuadMesh contains function #22967

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 5, 2022

Conversation

greglucas
Copy link
Contributor

PR Summary

As noted in #22957 (comment) it would be nice to have a few more tests for the contains of QuadMesh.

  • Update QuadMesh.get_cursor_data to handle multiple contains hits
  • Test that an empty array doesn't return any cursor_data
  • Test a few points in a standard QuadMesh
  • Test points within and around a concave QuadMesh

PR Checklist

Tests and Styling

  • Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes).
  • Is Flake 8 compliant (install flake8-docstrings and run flake8 --docstring-convention=all).

Documentation

  • [N/A] New features are documented, with examples if plot related.
  • [N/A] New features have an entry in doc/users/next_whats_new/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • [N/A] API changes documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • [N/A] Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).

* Update QuadMesh.get_cursor_data to handle multiple contains hits
* Test that an empty array doesn't return any cursor_data
* Test a few points in a standard QuadMesh
* Test points within and around a concave QuadMesh
Copy link
Contributor

@oscargus oscargus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think using a masked array may increase the coverage even further, but only as an added bonus.

@timhoffm timhoffm merged commit 078a9cb into matplotlib:main May 5, 2022
@greglucas greglucas deleted the tst-quadmesh-cursor branch May 5, 2022 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants