Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Function wrapper for examples/api/two_scales.py #7831

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 15, 2017

Conversation

dstansby
Copy link
Member

@dstansby dstansby commented Jan 14, 2017

Doing a bit of old PR hoovering, this supersedes #3582 (which seems to have stalled a couple of years ago)

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 62.09% (diff: 100%)

Merging #7831 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%

@@             master      #7831   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           174        174          
  Lines         56052      56052          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
- Hits          34809      34807     -2   
- Misses        21243      21245     +2   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 9edcb03...213403f

@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the 2.1 (next point release) milestone Jan 15, 2017
@tacaswell tacaswell changed the title Function wrapper for examples/api/two_scales.py [MRG+1] Function wrapper for examples/api/two_scales.py Jan 15, 2017
@NelleV NelleV merged commit b078a19 into matplotlib:master Jan 15, 2017
@NelleV
Copy link
Member

NelleV commented Jan 15, 2017

Thanks @dstansby !

@QuLogic QuLogic changed the title [MRG+1] Function wrapper for examples/api/two_scales.py Function wrapper for examples/api/two_scales.py Jan 15, 2017
@dstansby dstansby deleted the two-scales-wrapper branch January 22, 2017 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants