Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis #8322

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 6, 2017
Merged

Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis #8322

merged 2 commits into from Apr 6, 2017

Conversation

dstansby
Copy link
Member

This is a duplicate of #6834 , but with an what's-new entry.

@dstansby dstansby added this to the 2.1 (next point release) milestone Mar 18, 2017
@NelleV NelleV mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2017
Closed
anntzer
anntzer approved these changes Apr 5, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This was originally a PR from @zblz which had already been approved by @dstansby, so unless someone protests I will merge this in a few days.

@anntzer anntzer changed the title Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis [MRG+1] Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis Apr 5, 2017
@tacaswell tacaswell merged commit 4ba8903 into matplotlib:master Apr 6, 2017
@QuLogic QuLogic changed the title [MRG+1] Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis Use scalars below a certain exponent in labes of log-scales axis Apr 6, 2017
@dstansby dstansby deleted the min-exponent branch May 20, 2017 10:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anntzer anntzer anntzer approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@dstansby @anntzer @tacaswell @zblz