Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC2316: Federation queries to aid with database recovery #2316

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: old_master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tulir
Copy link
Member

@tulir tulir commented Oct 8, 2019

Author: @jevolk

Rendered

Co-authored-by: Jason Volk <jason@zemos.net>
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason Volk <jason@zemos.net>
@turt2live turt2live added the proposal A matrix spec change proposal label Oct 8, 2019
tulir and others added 4 commits October 8, 2019 20:34
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
Co-authored-by: Jason Volk <jason@zemos.net>
Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <tulir@maunium.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason Volk <jason@zemos.net>
@tulir tulir marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2019 08:00
@turt2live turt2live changed the title MSC2316: Federation queries to aid with database recovery [WIP] MSC2316: Federation queries to aid with database recovery Dec 7, 2019
@tulir
Copy link
Member Author

tulir commented Dec 18, 2019

@turt2live I don't think this is particularly WIP (or at least I hope I marked it ready for review because it was ready for review)

@turt2live turt2live changed the title [WIP] MSC2316: Federation queries to aid with database recovery MSC2316: Federation queries to aid with database recovery Dec 18, 2019
@turt2live turt2live added the kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff label Apr 20, 2020
value, but SHOULD NOT return more events than the specified value.

> Note that if a limit is imposed, the selection for *which* member events
are included in the response is implementation dependent.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be changed to prefer including at least the latest join events in each room? Otherwise it would be possible for the response to only include leave events, which by my understanding would not be terribly useful since the server could then think it's not in the rooms for those events.

@turt2live turt2live marked this pull request as draft April 8, 2021 23:36
@turt2live turt2live marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2021 23:40
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 22, 2021

there was an initial implementation of this at matrix-org/synapse#6230, but it got abandoned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants