Skip to content

[WIP] MSC2802: Full Room Abstraction#2802

Draft
ShadowJonathan wants to merge 3 commits intomatrix-org:old_masterfrom
ShadowJonathan:flip-the-table
Draft

[WIP] MSC2802: Full Room Abstraction#2802
ShadowJonathan wants to merge 3 commits intomatrix-org:old_masterfrom
ShadowJonathan:flip-the-table

Conversation

@ShadowJonathan
Copy link
Contributor

@ShadowJonathan ShadowJonathan commented Oct 5, 2020

Rendered

Signed-off-by: Jonathan de Jong <jonathan@automatia.nl>

@ShadowJonathan ShadowJonathan changed the title [WIP] MSCXXXX: Flip The Table for Full Room Abstraction [WIP] MSC2802: Flip The Table for Full Room Abstraction Oct 5, 2020
@turt2live turt2live added kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal labels Oct 5, 2020
@ShadowJonathan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I created a room specifically discussing this MSC, #spec-table-flipper:jboi.nl, by @turt2live's request

@ShadowJonathan
Copy link
Contributor Author

#1840 and #2773 might be related to this.

@turt2live turt2live removed their request for review November 10, 2020 05:29
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@MayeulC MayeulC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would have to re-read this in detail. Generally, I like this MSC. I just object to PSS not being in a room.

Going forward, I can see "everything-as-a-room", with Matrix servers providing base room functionality, and implementing IM-specific functionality with appservices. Not sure if someone else agrees with that vision?

Comment on lines +170 to +172
The Personal Server State refers to a `(target, type)` Key-Value data structure persisted on the
server, personal to the user, which can be manipulated by the corresponding user at any time. This
"state" has analogies with "room state" in the way that room state is also a Key-Value mapping.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't that PSS be a better fit for a private room?
Think "profiles-as-rooms", but with a public as well as a private room.

Private rooms could still federate (portable identities). They could contain that kind of mappings as room events. Other stuff such as key backup, etc could be part of the room state.

@richvdh richvdh changed the title [WIP] MSC2802: Flip The Table for Full Room Abstraction [WIP] MSC2802: Full Room Abstraction Aug 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments