Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP]MSC3066: Retrieve as redacted #3066

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[WIP]MSC3066: Retrieve as redacted #3066

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

erkinalp
Copy link

@erkinalp erkinalp commented Mar 17, 2021

This MSC will provide standardised API endpoints for debug and enforcement access to sanitised data.

Signed-off by: Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035@gmail.com>
@erkinalp erkinalp marked this pull request as draft March 17, 2021 20:29
@turt2live turt2live added kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal labels Mar 17, 2021
Signed-off by: Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035@gmail.com>

To retrieve events with fields redacted, the query parameter `filter` shall be set as an array of
strings denoting URL-encoded JSON keys. The server will then return a response comprising of the event
with those fields filtered out.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which fields have you wanted to filter out? Have you had a real world example you have wanted this for?

I am only thinking of content at the moment leaving the metadata behind.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

origin_server_ts and sender come to mind for participant survey use cases to blind the surveyors from the participants.

@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@richvdh richvdh deleted the branch matrix-org:master August 27, 2021 18:24
@richvdh richvdh closed this Aug 27, 2021
@turt2live turt2live added the abandoned A proposal where the author/shepherd is not responsive label Aug 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
abandoned A proposal where the author/shepherd is not responsive kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants