Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC3919: Matrix Message Format (IETF/MIMI) #3919

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live commented Oct 28, 2022

Rendered (latest IETF draft)

This MSC is slightly different to other proposals in the Matrix spec process. Instead of proposing changes to Matrix, it is proposing adoption of Matrix at the IETF level. Comments raised against this MSC will be taken into consideration in two places: under the MIMI working group and within the Matrix spec process where appropriate.

This MSC serves to show what the Spec Core Team/Matrix.org Foundation is thinking about with respect to modern messenger interoperability in the context of IETF.

@turt2live turt2live changed the title Placeholder MSC MSC3919 Placeholder MSC (format) Oct 28, 2022
@turt2live turt2live changed the title MSC3919 Placeholder MSC (format) MSC3919: Matrix Message Format (IETF/MIMI) Oct 28, 2022
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API meta Something that is not a spec change/request and is not related to the build tools kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success hacktoberfest-accepted labels Oct 28, 2022
@turt2live turt2live marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2022 01:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API hacktoberfest-accepted kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success meta Something that is not a spec change/request and is not related to the build tools proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants