MSC3980: Dotted Field Consistency - #3980
Conversation
|
@mscbot fcp merge |
|
Team member @turt2live has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people: Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travisr@matrix.org>
|
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
|
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. |
|
Spec PR: matrix-org/matrix-spec#1464 |
|
Merged 🎉 |
|
Better late than never: we didn't require an implemention on this because the MSC is effectively self-referencing. That's to say it's so trivial that a formal PR/deployment with the MSC's behaviour wouldn't prove anything we don't already know, so the MSC simply existing acts as "implementation". We talked about it in a public room somewhere (#matrix-spec I think?) stating this. |
Rendered
FCP tickyboxes