Skip to content

MSC3980: Dotted Field Consistency - #3980

Merged
uhoreg merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
clokep/dotted-consistency
Apr 2, 2023
Merged

MSC3980: Dotted Field Consistency#3980
uhoreg merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
clokep/dotted-consistency

Conversation

@clokep

@clokep clokep commented Mar 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@clokep
clokep marked this pull request as ready for review March 15, 2023 18:15
@turt2live turt2live added A-Push proposal A matrix spec change proposal. Process state. A-Client Server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. and removed needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Mar 15, 2023
Comment thread proposals/3980-dotted-fields-consistency.md Outdated
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mscbot fcp merge

@mscbot

mscbot commented Mar 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Team member @turt2live has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the FCP. Process state. disposition-merge Process state. labels Mar 15, 2023
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travisr@matrix.org>

@anoadragon453 anoadragon453 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After having a quick browse through the spec, I see no other inconsistencies with backslash handling :)

@mscbot

mscbot commented Mar 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period Process state to accept, reject, or postpone an MSC. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the FCP. Process state. labels Mar 28, 2023
@mscbot

mscbot commented Apr 2, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period FCP has finished. Process state. and removed disposition-merge Process state. final-comment-period Process state to accept, reject, or postpone an MSC. labels Apr 2, 2023
@uhoreg
uhoreg merged commit bf8a50c into main Apr 2, 2023
@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-missing MSC is accepted, but missing spec PR. Process state. and removed finished-final-comment-period FCP has finished. Process state. labels Apr 2, 2023
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Spec PR: matrix-org/matrix-spec#1464

@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review and removed spec-pr-missing MSC is accepted, but missing spec PR. Process state. labels Apr 3, 2023
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merged 🎉

@turt2live turt2live added merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! Process state. and removed spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review labels Apr 4, 2023
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Better late than never: we didn't require an implemention on this because the MSC is effectively self-referencing. That's to say it's so trivial that a formal PR/deployment with the MSC's behaviour wouldn't prove anything we don't already know, so the MSC simply existing acts as "implementation".

We talked about it in a public room somewhere (#matrix-spec I think?) stating this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-Client Server Client-Server API A-Push kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! Process state. proposal A matrix spec change proposal. Process state.

Projects

Status: Merged/Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants