Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC4030: Progressive image in Matrix #4030

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ru-ka
Copy link

@ru-ka ru-ka commented Jun 14, 2023

Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ru-ka when you get a chance, please sign off on your changes. This is one of the criteria for the MSC to enter FCP.

proposals/MSC4030: Progressive images in Matrix.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/MSC4030: Progressive images in Matrix.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Jun 14, 2023
ru-ka and others added 2 commits June 15, 2023 01:05
@InezMc
Copy link

InezMc commented Jun 15, 2023

Private sign off recieved to dco@matrix.org from @ru-ka and recorded.

Co-authored-by: Paarth Shah <mail@shahpaarth.com>

This distinction exists because server-side generated thumbnails cannot be served in encrypted rooms or for media types other than `m.image`.

### Reasons behind API changes
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This MSC appears to have missed a section where it describes what the API changes are.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This MSC appears to have missed a section where it describes what the API changes are.

It probably was an oversight. I'll correct the MSC ASAP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants