Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MSC4077: Improved process for handling deprecated HTML features #4077

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 25, 2024
Merged

MSC4077: Improved process for handling deprecated HTML features #4077

merged 3 commits into from Feb 25, 2024

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live commented Nov 14, 2023 •
edited by tulir

Rendered

Implementation: Not required. This MSC is a process change proposal, and cannot realistically be implemented as-is.

FCP tickyboxes

@turt2live turt2live marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2023 04:15
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal process Related to the spec process itself (MSC process) kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec labels Nov 14, 2023
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

In an effort to get relatively immediate feedback, or to close this MSC in favour of Just Doing It:

@mscbot fcp merge

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Nov 14, 2023 •
edited by clokep

Team member @turt2live has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. disposition-merge labels Nov 14, 2023
uhoreg
uhoreg reviewed Nov 15, 2023
View reviewed changes
proposals/4077-process-deprecated-html.md
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While this is a process MSC, it may still be worth noting in the spec that tags may be deprecated when the WHATWG deprecates them.

@turt2live turt2live mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Open
@turt2live @dbkr @uhoreg
Apply suggestions from code review
66f8b16 
Co-authored-by: David Baker <dbkr@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
@turt2live turt2live added this to Ready for FCP ticks in Spec Core Team Backlog Dec 21, 2023
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Feb 20, 2024

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Feb 20, 2024
@turt2live turt2live moved this from Ready for FCP ticks to In FCP in Spec Core Team Backlog Feb 20, 2024
cloudrac3r
cloudrac3r approved these changes Feb 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@cloudrac3r cloudrac3r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great idea.

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Feb 25, 2024

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period and removed disposition-merge final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. labels Feb 25, 2024
@turt2live turt2live merged commit 1da8bab into main Feb 25, 2024
1 check passed
@turt2live turt2live deleted the travis/msc/strike branch February 25, 2024 22:23
@turt2live turt2live moved this from In FCP to Requires spec writing in Spec Core Team Backlog Feb 25, 2024
@turt2live turt2live added the spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec label Feb 25, 2024
@cloudrac3r cloudrac3r mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Merged
3 tasks
@zecakeh zecakeh mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Merged
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

Spec PR: matrix-org/matrix-spec#1629
Spec PR: matrix-org/matrix-spec#1732

@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review and removed spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec labels Feb 26, 2024
@turt2live turt2live moved this from Requires spec writing to Requires spec PR review in Spec Core Team Backlog Feb 26, 2024
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

Merged 🎉

@turt2live turt2live added merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! and removed spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review labels Mar 3, 2024
@turt2live turt2live moved this from Requires spec PR review to Done to some definition in Spec Core Team Backlog Mar 3, 2024
@zecakeh zecakeh mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
Closed
28 tasks
@Mikaela Mikaela mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024
Closed
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dbkr dbkr dbkr left review comments

@uhoreg uhoreg uhoreg left review comments

@cloudrac3r cloudrac3r cloudrac3r approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! process Related to the spec process itself (MSC process) proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
Spec Core Team Backlog
  
Done to some definition
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@turt2live @mscbot @dbkr @uhoreg @cloudrac3r