Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spelling: s2s authorization header says 'receiving sender' instead of 'receiving server' #1231

Closed
turt2live opened this issue Sep 6, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1431
Closed
Labels
clarification An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit help wanted Interested in contributing to the spec? These would be great additions!

Comments

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

https://spec.matrix.org/v1.3/server-server-api/#request-authentication

@turt2live turt2live added help wanted Interested in contributing to the spec? These would be great additions! clarification An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit labels Sep 6, 2022
@saiprakash2
Copy link
Contributor

Can I fix this issue?

saiprakash2 added a commit to saiprakash2/matrix-spec that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2023
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Feb 13, 2023

You don't need to ask for permission. Contributions are welcome. Please read https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst.

turt2live added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2023
* Issue #1231/Update spelling in s2s authorization

* Update spelling in s2s authorization.

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
clokep pushed a commit to clokep/matrix-spec that referenced this issue May 3, 2023
* Issue matrix-org#1231/Update spelling in s2s authorization

* Update spelling in s2s authorization.

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit help wanted Interested in contributing to the spec? These would be great additions!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants