[Fix] table name overwritten when show table status

[ck89119]

What type of PR is this?

• API-change
• BUG
• Improvement
• Documentation
• Feature
• Test and CI
• Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue #2917

What this PR does / why we need it:

table name overwritten when show table status

[matrix-meow]

@ck89119 Thanks for your contributions!

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and concise, indicating that it is a fix for an issue related to the table name being overwritten when showing table status.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR (BUG), the specific issue it fixes (#2917), and the reason for the PR (table name being overwritten when showing table status).

Changes:

1. In mysql_cmd_executor.go:

   • Line 500: Changed the parameter false to true in the extractRowFromEveryVector function call.

2. In query_result.go:

   • Line 566: Changed the parameter false to true in the extractRowFromEveryVector function call.

Feedback and Suggestions:

1. Parameter Change in Function Call:

   • The changes made in both files involve modifying the last parameter of the extractRowFromEveryVector function call from false to true. It seems like this change is related to a specific fix for the issue mentioned.
   • Suggestion: Ensure that changing the parameter from false to true is the correct fix for the issue. Verify if this change is necessary for resolving the problem of table name overwriting. If the change is confirmed to be correct, consider adding comments explaining why this modification is needed for future reference.

2. Code Consistency:

   • It's important to maintain consistency in code changes. If the parameter true is now required for the extractRowFromEveryVector function, ensure that this change is reflected consistently across all relevant code locations.
   • Suggestion: Check if there are other instances where the extractRowFromEveryVector function is called and ensure that the parameter is updated consistently wherever necessary to avoid any unexpected behavior.

3. Testing:

   • Since this PR is related to a bug fix, it is crucial to test the changes thoroughly to ensure that the issue is resolved without introducing new problems.
   • Suggestion: Consider adding test cases that cover the scenario where the table name was being overwritten to validate that the fix works as expected. Automated tests can help prevent regressions and ensure the stability of the codebase.

4. Security Concerns:

   • Based on the provided diff, there are no apparent security issues. However, it's always good practice to review code changes for potential security vulnerabilities, especially when modifying critical functions.
   • Suggestion: Perform a security review of the changes to ensure that the fix does not introduce any security vulnerabilities. Pay attention to input validation, data sanitization, and access control to mitigate security risks.

5. Optimization:

   • The changes in this PR seem straightforward and focused on addressing the specific issue. To optimize the changes further, consider if there are any additional improvements or optimizations that can be made while working on this code.
   • Suggestion: Look for opportunities to refactor or optimize the code while addressing the bug fix. This could involve improving performance, readability, or maintainability of the code.

By addressing the suggestions provided and ensuring thorough testing, the quality and reliability of the codebase can be enhanced. Additionally, incorporating best practices for code consistency and security will contribute to a more robust software development process.