New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[dead-code] Apply remove default null and && over ternary rules #12960
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 5.x #12960 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage ? 58.86%
Complexity ? 33578
======================================
Files ? 2181
Lines ? 101743
Branches ? 0
======================================
Hits ? 59892
Misses ? 41851
Partials ? 0
|
Good to go 👍 |
327ebd0
to
e47dc2e
Compare
e47dc2e
to
131d2ac
Compare
Good to go 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, these changes simplify the code and cannot cause any trouble than there already is. Calling some method on null
would result in 500 error anyway.
No description provided.