Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove requirement of DIO pins #622

Closed
Bartvelp opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Remove requirement of DIO pins #622

Bartvelp opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Bartvelp
Copy link

Bartvelp commented Nov 7, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently I am using an ESP8266, which has limited GPIO output and would like to shrink the required number of pins to just the MOSI, MISO, CLK and CS pins. (and perhaps RST but I am not sure it is necessary for the RFM95W) As far as I am able to understand, the DIO pins are used for interrupts, which are not used by default, as you need to enable them in the project config file and by reading this issue: #332 (comment)

Describe the solution you'd like
Implement the pull request made to matthijs kooijmans repo by hallard
matthijskooijman#34

Describe alternatives you've considered
I have considered just removing the asserts by the library but I am not sure if that would lead to unexpected state/behaviour.

Additional context
I am not LMIC proficient enough to determine if I could just remake the pull request in this repo by hallard or that too much has changed in the mean time in the under lying implementation.

@Bartvelp Bartvelp changed the title Remove required DIO pins Remove requirement of DIO pins Nov 7, 2020
@terrillmoore
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #577

@terrillmoore terrillmoore marked this as a duplicate of #577 Dec 10, 2020
@terrillmoore
Copy link
Member

As part of cleaning things up, I'm closing duplicates. Sorry you were having problems!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants