You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
### Description
- Fixes#676
To address listing the values for `<ray-size>`, I've referred to the
instructions in the `mdn/data/docs` section [Store the information in
the
JSONs](https://github.com/mdn/data/blob/main/docs/updating_css_json.md#store-the-information-in-the-jsons),
where it mentions how to handle when "syntax contains references to
specific values".
I've added `"syntaxes"` for `ray()` in `syntaxes.json`. I've included
only the keys that have further values. I'm not sure if that's the
correct way to do it though. I am assuming this should be okay because
the complete syntax exists in `functions.json`.
**UPDATE**: `"syntaxes"` is not supported, was getting lint errors. I've
reverted to use `syntax` but expanded the `<ray-size>` and `<position>`
values inline.
- I'm also using this PR to update `ray()` function syntax (mdn/content
PR to add [Formal
syntax](https://pr31514.content.dev.mdn.mozit.cloud/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/ray#formal_syntax)).
With Firefox122 coming out on Jan 23, 2024, `ray()` will be supported by
default, making it standard across browsers. So I've also updated the
status to `standard` (BCD PR with [ray() status
update](https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/21844/files#diff-5153a0172f96a72ece248c9d29cea659e3ecd45c45d81d57b0b6f2f00c57e7b3R98)).
### Motivation
Addressing an issue as well as updating the syntax
### Related issues and pull requests
mdn/browser-compat-data#21844mdn/content#31514
What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?
ray-size
isn't defined.What did you expect to see?
I expected it to be defined as
closest-side | closest-corner | farthest-side | farthest-corner | sides
Do you have any supporting links, references, or citations?
https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/#typedef-ray-size
Do you have anything more you want to share?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: