You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In recent Travis run https://travis-ci.org/mdp-toolkit/mdp-toolkit/builds/553703911 I observed that the first two specific configurations took about 14-15 minutes to complete while all other runs took only about 2-5 minutes.
The long-taking runs were Python 3.5 + NumPy 1.8.2 + SciKits 0.18. However a later run with Python 3.5 + NumPy 1.12.1 + SciKits 0.18 was okay so it seems to be caused by NumPy 1.8.2.
It looks like the tests were hanging most time at test_SFANode.
It is difficult to see whether the log contains more useful info because it is totally spammed with the deprecation warning mentioned in #49. So we better fix that one first.
Also, given that the issuous configuration is somewhat odd this doesn't have high priority. I'd like to track it though as it might point to an issue in test_SFANode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is not explicitly stated, which Python versions are supported by Numpy 1.8.2, but Numpy 1.8.0 supports only 2.6 -2.7/3.2 - 3.3 and Numpy 1.9.0 supports only 2.6 - 2.7 and 3.2 - 3.4 [1]. So I propose this change to address [issue 50](#50).
[1] https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/release.html
In recent Travis run https://travis-ci.org/mdp-toolkit/mdp-toolkit/builds/553703911 I observed that the first two specific configurations took about 14-15 minutes to complete while all other runs took only about 2-5 minutes.
The long-taking runs were Python 3.5 + NumPy 1.8.2 + SciKits 0.18. However a later run with Python 3.5 + NumPy 1.12.1 + SciKits 0.18 was okay so it seems to be caused by NumPy 1.8.2.
It looks like the tests were hanging most time at
test_SFANode
.It is difficult to see whether the log contains more useful info because it is totally spammed with the deprecation warning mentioned in #49. So we better fix that one first.
Also, given that the issuous configuration is somewhat odd this doesn't have high priority. I'd like to track it though as it might point to an issue in
test_SFANode
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: