Release 1.9.8 #1793
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
I guess just for tracking purposes it looks like there appears to have been an issue with Cython (sorry was out last week)? The bandaid fix constraint is great (thanks for that!) but for a longer-term cython support do we want to push that within this release or push it to a future release? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yup - Cython dropped version 3.0.0 on Monday (a notable jump up from the previous 0.29.36!) and I'm planning to get 1.9.9 tagged within the next day or so. Tracked in #1800 for more context, the short version being: If you are getting errors with
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The idea is 1.9.9 is the same source code but includes the Cython downpin in This isn't necessarily the most elegant course of action but I think it's clearly the most practical one. The ideal situation is everything is fixed quickly and we can push those updates out into new releases rapidly, but that's not guaranteed to happen in the timespan of a couple of days. Getting |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
100% agree that this is the best course of action - getting a working version with 1.9.9 followed by a Cython 3 compatible update makes the most sense to me! It'll also give us the flexibility of time to figure out the fix |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've tagged version 1.9.8 and uploaded the sdist to PyPI. Conda packages are online soon.
This release should support Python 3.11 and the
osx-arm64
architecture.Please use this discussion to report any deployment issues with this version specifically.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions