Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[master < T0766-MG] Fix ORDER BY and temporal types #299

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021

Conversation

antonio2368
Copy link
Contributor

[master < Task] PR

  • Check, and update documentation if necessary
  • Update changelog

Copy link
Contributor

@kostasrim kostasrim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 🚀 🚀

@antaljanosbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe one more question: do we want to allow the comparison between date and datetime? witthout this, it feels like a bit incomplete (a date can be considered as a datetime with the time part zerod out).

@antonio2368
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe one more question: do we want to allow the comparison between date and datetime? witthout this, it feels like a bit incomplete (a date can be considered as a datetime with the time part zerod out).

If we do that we should allow the same thing in the comparison operator for TypedValues which we don't for now.
We can definitely discuss this.

@antonio2368 antonio2368 merged commit 6c971b8 into master Nov 16, 2021
@antonio2368 antonio2368 deleted the T0766-MG-fix-order-by-and-temporal-types branch November 16, 2021 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Comparison for temporal types is not implemented
4 participants