Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unlock IFD/ME on '8M-bottom' chip when only '4M-top' flashed #175

Closed
fhvyhjriur opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Unlock IFD/ME on '8M-bottom' chip when only '4M-top' flashed #175

fhvyhjriur opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@fhvyhjriur
Copy link
Contributor

fhvyhjriur commented Dec 1, 2020

I flashed once skulls following the skulls-howto. There it was and is still written, that flashing the bottom is optional. And because the external flasher was not able to detect for some reason the 8M-chip(worked fine for the 4M) i skipped the 8M-chip because it was written optional and nowhere any warnings that for example future heads releases wont work.
I gave then my external flasher to other people and dont have it any more.

When i update skulls i always see:
FREG0: Flash Descriptor region (0x00000000-0x00000fff) is read-only.
FREG2: Management Engine region (0x00003000-0x004fffff) is locked.

Now i would really like to use the additional space and shrink the ME. Also heads is requiring this for more modern releases: linuxboot/heads#307
linuxboot/heads#703

Is it in the meantime possible to unlock the IFD/ME without me having to order some external flasher again? I have fully unlocked 4M chip and can install whatever i need into there.

@merge
Copy link
Owner

merge commented Dec 7, 2020

well. read what the optional 8m chip flashing would do: unlock the ifd. that's optional for installing Skulls, but of course you only can flash externally then. That's intended.

Should we improve the documentation? how?

@fhvyhjriur
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we improve the documentation? how?

After spending some more time into learning the backgrounds, i made two pull requests. One for the x230 and one for the x230t installation documentation.

merge pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2020
This adds more clear information why unlocking the IFD that is part of the 8MB
chip is highly recommended these days.
Related to #175
merge pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2021
This adds more clear information why unlocking the IFD that is part of the 8MB chip is highly recommended these days.
Related to #175
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants