You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm testing Github merge queue and the Mergeable app doesn't run for PRs in the merge queue.
For some background: PR branches in the merge queue are rebased with the main branch. Then required PR checks must pass again before the original PR actually gets merged into the main branch.
Is there a way to handle checks in the merge queue? I'm thinking of something like when: merge_group.*or just having checks from a merge group be marked a "pass" since they already passed in the PR.
Side note: merge queue is a beta feature. One of the top requested (but not yet implemented!) features is to require a separate set of checks in the queue. So an alternative could be to wait for that capability and then I would not include mergeable in the queue checks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if they send over a webhook, you can add code to mergeable to be able to handle it. I suspect there will be a need to update permission in order to receive merge_group webhook events
I'm testing Github merge queue and the Mergeable app doesn't run for PRs in the merge queue.
For some background: PR branches in the merge queue are rebased with the main branch. Then required PR checks must pass again before the original PR actually gets merged into the main branch.
I assume the issue is either that the app doesn't handle
merge_group
hooks or that a separate branch is made for PRs in the merge queue. For reference this seems to be a common issue.Is there a way to handle checks in the merge queue? I'm thinking of something like
when: merge_group.*
or just having checks from a merge group be marked a "pass" since they already passed in the PR.Side note: merge queue is a beta feature. One of the top requested (but not yet implemented!) features is to require a separate set of checks in the queue. So an alternative could be to wait for that capability and then I would not include mergeable in the queue checks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: