We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seems there's a bug in explicate-premise. The following definition crashes during explication:
explicate-premise
module ds/l09 signature sorts Expr Cmd Val Scope FrameId Label Occurrence H arrows Cmd -cmd-> Val Expr --> Val constructors Decl : String * Expr * Cmd -> Cmd native operators getCmdScopes : Cmd -> List(Scope) sorts initDefault__Arrow set__Arrow constructors initDefault : Scope * Map(Label, Map(Scope, FrameId)) -> initDefault__Arrow set : Occurrence * Val -> set__Arrow getOcc : String -> Occurrence P : Label arrows initDefault__Arrow -initDefault-> FrameId set__Arrow -set-> H variables h : H f : FrameId v : Val rules // DynSem's explicate-premise strategy fails on this term: f |- c@Decl(x, v, c') -cmd-> v' where getCmdScopes(c) => [s1, s2]; initDefault(s2, {P() |--> {s1 |--> f}}) -initDefault-> f' :: h; f', h |- set(getOcc(x), v) -set-> h'; f' |- c' :: h' -cmd-> v'. // // DynSem's explicate-premise strategy succeeds on this term: // f |- c@Decl(x, v, c') :: h0 -cmd-> v' :: h3 // where // getCmdScopes(c) => [s1, s2]; // initDefault(s2, {P() |--> {s1 |--> f}}) :: h0 -initDefault-> f' :: h1; // f', h1 |- set(getOcc(x), v) -set-> h2; // f' |- c' :: h2 -cmd-> v' :: h3.
Error:
org.metaborg.core.transform.TransformException: Invoking Stratego strategy module-to-core-editor failed at term Formula( Relation( Reads([]) , Source(VarRef("_lifted_54"), []) , NamedDynamicEmitted([], "initDefault") , Target( VarRef("_lifted_55") , [LabelComp(SimpleSort("H"), VarRef("h"))] ) ) ) Stratego trace: module_to_core_editor_0_0 module_to_core_editor_0_0 module_to_core_0_2 in_project_path_1_1 dr_scope_1_1 explicate_module_0_0 m_in_extracted_components_1_0 explicate_rules_0_0 alltd_1_0 explicate_rule_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premises_0_0 explicate_premise_0_0 report_with_failure_0_1 report_failure_0_2 SRTS_EXT_fatal_err_0_2 at org.metaborg.spoofax.core.transform.StrategoTransformer.transform(StrategoTransformer.java:140) ~[org.metaborg.spoofax.core_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.spoofax.core.transform.StrategoTransformer.transform(StrategoTransformer.java:65) ~[org.metaborg.spoofax.core_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.spoofax.core.transform.StrategoTransformer.transform(StrategoTransformer.java:1) ~[org.metaborg.spoofax.core_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.core.transform.TransformService.transform(TransformService.java:55) ~[org.metaborg.core_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.core.transform.TransformService.transform(TransformService.java:42) ~[org.metaborg.core_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse.transform.TransformJob.transform(TransformJob.java:141) [org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse.transform.TransformJob.transformAll(TransformJob.java:108) [org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse.transform.TransformJob.run(TransformJob.java:70) [org.metaborg.spoofax.eclipse_2.1.0.20160809-125800-feature_scopes-and-frames.jar:na] at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55) [org.eclipse.core.jobs_3.8.0.v20160509-0411.jar:na] [...]
However, if one uncomments the second rule in the example program, explication succeeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Disable hard failure of new explication. This effectively closes #91, c…
879e27b
…loses #86, closes #87, closes #92.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Seems there's a bug in
explicate-premise
. The following definition crashes during explication:Error:
However, if one uncomments the second rule in the example program, explication succeeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: