-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Render BMO deployment #672
Render BMO deployment #672
Conversation
/test-integration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add the rendered file in the hack/generate.sh file so that it is checked by the job
It is already checked in generate.sh the whole config dir. |
oh true! sorry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise looks good
--- | ||
apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: CustomResourceDefinition | ||
metadata: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't you face metadata error because it raises error when you apply kustomize on rendered file ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't get you, do you suggest a change here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem. That's fine. I can see change in manager.yaml.
c080d94
to
484c3d7
Compare
/cc @dhellmann @stbenjam |
/test-integration |
--- | ||
apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: CustomResourceDefinition | ||
metadata: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem. That's fine. I can see change in manager.yaml.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: digambar15, kashifest, maelk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Getting this in to unlock work on CAPM3 side. The namespace change is required because the recent version of Kustomize does not apply the "namespace" kustomization to the namespace object name itself. /lgtm If there are any comments, we will address them in a second PR. |
This looks fine, but for my own education can you confirm that we're checking this rendered file in because CI jobs use it? |
Yes, this rendered file is here to make sure that duplication of name of the objects doesn't collide while we kustomize all resources in CI |
Great, thank you for explaining that! |
It's actually not limited to CI. Whenever we run the kustomization in CAPM3, we are now using this file. |
This PR adds a render of BMO deployment.
It takes care of the task done at #667