Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

URGENT: Citation of standards that have a withdrawn past incorrectly marked as "withdrawn" #591

Closed
ronaldtse opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that citing an undated standard that has a withdrawn edition will mark the whole standard as "withdrawn". Remember that the undated standard reference obtains metadata from the "newest active edition".

For example, ISO 9000 is current https://www.iso.org/standard/45481.html
Screenshot 2022-03-09 at 9 51 12 AM

However, this code gives a withdrawn result:

<<ISO_9000>> explains that quality is not an abstract concept of absolute
perfection. Quality is actually the conformance of characteristics to
requirements. This actuality means that any item of data can be of high quality
for one purpose but not for a different purpose. The quality is different
because the requirements are different between the two purposes.

...
[bibliography]
== Bibliography

* [[[ISO_9000,ISO 9000]]]]

Rendered as:
Screenshot 2022-03-09 at 9 52 16 AM

Metanorma is now treating so many documents as withdrawn, incorrectly.

Screenshot 2022-03-09 at 9 53 19 AM

Screenshot 2022-03-09 at 9 53 43 AM

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

@opoudjis @andrew2net is this a Relaton problem or a Metanorma problem? If a Relaton problem please create a ticket in Relaton-ISO. Thanks!

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Mar 9, 2022

It's relaton:

bundle exec relaton fetch "ISO 9000"

[relaton] Info: detecting backends:
<bibitem id="ISO9000" type="standard">
  <fetched>2022-03-09</fetched>
  <title type="title-intro" format="text/plain" language="en" script="Latn">Quality management systems</title>
  <title type="title-main" format="text/plain" language="en" script="Latn">Fundamentals and vocabulary</title>
  <title type="main" format="text/plain" language="en" script="Latn">Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary</title>
  <uri type="src">https://www.iso.org/standard/45481.html</uri>
  <uri type="obp">https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#!iso:std:45481:en</uri>
  <uri type="rss">https://www.iso.org/contents/data/standard/04/54/45481.detail.rss</uri>
  <docidentifier type="ISO" primary="true">ISO 9000</docidentifier>
  <docidentifier type="URN">urn:iso:std:iso:9000:stage-90.93:ed-4:en</docidentifier>
  <docnumber>9000</docnumber>
  <contributor>
    <role type="publisher"/>
    <organization>
      <name>International Organization for Standardization</name>
      <abbreviation>ISO</abbreviation>
      <uri>www.iso.org</uri>
    </organization>
  </contributor>
  <edition>4</edition>
  <language>en</language>
  <script>Latn</script>
  <status>
    <stage>90</stage>
    <substage>93</substage>
  </status>
  <copyright>
    <from>2015</from>
    <owner>
      <organization>
        <name>ISO</name>
      </organization>
    </owner>
  </copyright>
  <relation type="obsoletes">
    <bibitem type="standard">
      <formattedref format="text/plain">ISO 9000:2005</formattedref>
    </bibitem>
  </relation>

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Mar 9, 2022

relaton/relaton-iso#106

@andrew2net
Copy link
Contributor

the status of the returned by relaton document is 90.93 "confirmed"

<status>
    <stage>90</stage>
    <substage>93</substage>
</status>

as it is on the document's page

image

I don't understand what we need to fix.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

90.93 is correct as in “confirmed”. Maybe Metanorma is mistaking that code for withdrawn?

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

It is.

@opoudjis opoudjis reopened this Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants