Pick via the "Received Amount" #12694
Assignees
Labels
branch:master
branch:release
branch:tenacious_d_uat
cmp:backend
backend issue (cmp="component")
in:5.175_release
Comments
metas-rc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
* #add process AD + code and updating view (modal) * #deduplicate code * #cleaning code * #deduplicating code * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * # adj trls and process param name * # picking context fix * #cleaning code.. * Refactoring #12694 * Refactoring #12694 * * get the projected qtyDelivered from shipment schedule * further refactoring #12694 * Adjust test #12694 Co-authored-by: metas_rc <ruxandra.craciunescu@metasfresh.com>
cp-ps
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 11, 2022
* Corrections in invoice cand aggregator (#12625) * Bring back standard invoice cand aggregator #12624 * correction in quality discount aggregator #12624 * invoice candidate qtyToInvoiceBeforeDiscount #12624 (cherry picked from commit 54dc906) * Prio location from parameter * Make Inventory with aggregated HUs doctype default (#12671) * Make Inventory with aggregated HUs doctype default #12670 * typo #12670 * typo fixed #12670 * Set an ASI to the receipt schedule even if the order didn't have one (#12729) * Set an ASI to the receipt schedule even if the order didn't have one #12728 * refactoring; Sorting CUs before adding serial numbers #12728 * cleanup #12728 * refactoring, documentation #12728 * Gh12694 pick via recieved quantity in manufacturing order (#12730) * #add process AD + code and updating view (modal) * #deduplicate code * #cleaning code * #deduplicating code * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * # adj trls and process param name * # picking context fix * #cleaning code.. * Refactoring #12694 * Refactoring #12694 * * get the projected qtyDelivered from shipment schedule * further refactoring #12694 * Adjust test #12694 Co-authored-by: metas_rc <ruxandra.craciunescu@metasfresh.com> * after merge fixes * after merge fixes Co-authored-by: Ruxandra Craciunescu <ruxandra.craciunescu@metasfresh.com> Co-authored-by: Cristina Ghita <cristina.ghita@metasfresh.com> Co-authored-by: Chems NOUIOUA <chems.nouioua@gmail.com>
cp-ps
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 11, 2022
* Corrections in invoice cand aggregator (#12625) * Bring back standard invoice cand aggregator #12624 * correction in quality discount aggregator #12624 * invoice candidate qtyToInvoiceBeforeDiscount #12624 (cherry picked from commit 54dc906) * Prio location from parameter * Make Inventory with aggregated HUs doctype default (#12671) * Make Inventory with aggregated HUs doctype default #12670 * typo #12670 * typo fixed #12670 * Set an ASI to the receipt schedule even if the order didn't have one (#12729) * Set an ASI to the receipt schedule even if the order didn't have one #12728 * refactoring; Sorting CUs before adding serial numbers #12728 * cleanup #12728 * refactoring, documentation #12728 * Gh12694 pick via recieved quantity in manufacturing order (#12730) * #add process AD + code and updating view (modal) * #deduplicate code * #cleaning code * #deduplicating code * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * #deduplicating code n cleaning ... * # adj trls and process param name * # picking context fix * #cleaning code.. * Refactoring #12694 * Refactoring #12694 * * get the projected qtyDelivered from shipment schedule * further refactoring #12694 * Adjust test #12694 Co-authored-by: metas_rc <ruxandra.craciunescu@metasfresh.com> * after merge fixes * after merge fixes * after merge fixes Co-authored-by: Ruxandra Craciunescu <ruxandra.craciunescu@metasfresh.com> Co-authored-by: Cristina Ghita <cristina.ghita@metasfresh.com> Co-authored-by: Chems NOUIOUA <chems.nouioua@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is this a bug or feature request?
FR
What is the current behavior?
Pick every single line in manufacturing order
Which are the steps to reproduce?
/
What is the expected or desired behavior?
Is it possible in the first line (in addition to printing all labels) to also introduce a "pick process" for the complete quantity received?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: