PLV Name adjustment #6485
Labels
Comments
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
Merged
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
TheBestPessimist
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
metas-ts
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 21, 2020
* Hide PriceListVersion.Name from webui; Update PLV identifier #6485 * Add Model Interceptor for updating all PLV names #6485 * Add Model Interceptor for updating a single PLV name #6485 * Using `ModelValidator.TYPE_BEFORE_CHANGE` doesn't seem to work. #6485 * Callout is not working #6485 * For debugging #6485 * Updates work #6485 * Fix compilation #6485 * Move methods to BL from DAO #6485 * Warnings, nullability #6485 * Update trl #6485 * Invalidate cache for the updated records #6485
metas-ts
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2020
* Hide PriceListVersion.Name from webui; Update PLV identifier #6485 * Add Model Interceptor for updating all PLV names #6485 * Add Model Interceptor for updating a single PLV name #6485 * Using `ModelValidator.TYPE_BEFORE_CHANGE` doesn't seem to work. #6485 * Callout is not working #6485 * For debugging #6485 * Updates work #6485 * Fix compilation #6485 * Move methods to BL from DAO #6485 * Warnings, nullability #6485 * Update trl #6485 * Invalidate cache for the updated records #6485 (cherry picked from commit 7932483)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is this a bug or feature request?
FR
What is the current behavior?
Which are the steps to reproduce?
What is the expected or desired behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: