Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Buffer comparison support #104

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 29, 2016
Merged

Buffer comparison support #104

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 29, 2016

Conversation

hughrawlinson
Copy link
Member

or allows it to be passes, in the case of offline extraction. Paves the way for Flux!

@nevosegal
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a great addition which will allow us to add more incredible features. As we can't really test it atm, let's wait with the merge until we have a feature that uses this functionality. Otherwise 👍

@hughrawlinson hughrawlinson modified the milestones: v3.0.3, v3.0.1 Jan 31, 2016
This was referenced Feb 10, 2016
@nevosegal nevosegal modified the milestones: v3.1, v3.0.3 Feb 26, 2016
* Max lines at 80 chars
* Fixes some broken links in old comments
* Adheres us to AirBnb's styleguide, which is widely used and good
* Switches us from using jshint for linting to jscs
@hughrawlinson
Copy link
Member Author

@nevosegal This branch now includes flux. I'd appreciate tests, any chance you could generate the spectral flux data for one of our buffers so that we can test this? I need to squash the commits and rebase onto master once my other PR is merged anyway, so don't merge this PR yet.

By "other pr" I mean #123

Hugh Rawlinson added 2 commits March 29, 2016 10:45
Adds support for comparing the current buffer (and associated data) with
that of the previous frame.
We've wanted this for a long time. Fixes #30.
@hughrawlinson hughrawlinson merged commit d2719a1 into master Mar 29, 2016
@hughrawlinson hughrawlinson deleted the buffer-comparison-support branch September 15, 2016 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants