Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support many-to-many relationship between local pools and backup pools #6

Closed
mfinifter opened this issue Jul 11, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@mfinifter
Copy link
Owner

Configuration should be able to specify a many-to-many relationship between local pools and backup pools. I may want to backup several local pools to the same backup pool, or a single local pool to multiple backup pools (e.g., for rotating off-site backups). Or multiple local pools to multiple backup pools.

Expected behavior is that a backup should happen for all possible combinations specified. For example, suppose I want both salmon_tank and tuna_tank to backup to both backup_ocean and backup_lake. The following backups should occur:

  • salmon_tank to backup_ocean
  • tuna_tank to backup_ocean
  • salmon_tank to backup_lake
  • tuna_tank to backup_lake

In the common case, only one of the backup pools will be available. This is fine; fail silently (but generate a log message) for any backup pool that isn't available.

@mfinifter
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing because #8 will resolve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant