lipsum_from_seed missing in 0.9.0
#98
Comments
|
It looks like this was replaced by |
|
Also needless API breakage, without even deprecating the function first. I understand that this crate doesn't promise any stable API, but it's not like this would have been a huge effort. EDIT: I hope I don't sound to harsh, I'm very thankful to the maintainer spending his time working on this crate ♥. |
|
Hey folks! Sorry about causing trouble! @kalkin or @tgross35 would you be up for bringing back a The function was removed as part of #91, which had the goal of removing the dependency on the system randomness and thus allow lipsum to be used in WASM. There was some discussion there with @reknih about different approaches. |
|
That makes sense about the RNG. Honestly I wouldn't mind just gating the feature behind a |
|
A feature like that would work for us! It's good as long as there is a way to build |
Yeah, exactly! We can make the flag a default flag so that people can use the old API from 0.8.0. I will probably not get around to this anytime soon — @tgross35, could you create a PR for this? |
…er#98) I introduced the default feature `std` which enables the `rand` package features `std` & `std_rng` for the `thread_rng()` function. This allows user to use the rand package without adding it with the right features to own `Cargo.toml`.
|
Done. See #99. Feedback welcome. |
…er#98) I introduced the default feature `std` which enables the `rand` package features `std` & `std_rng` for the `thread_rng()` function. This allows user to use the rand package without adding it with the right features to own `Cargo.toml`.
It looks like
lipsum_from_seeddisappeared in 0.9. Is there a way to get this same functionality?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: