Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IPipeReader,IPipeWriter,IPipe version error #6

Closed
ghost opened this issue Nov 27, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

IPipeReader,IPipeWriter,IPipe version error #6

ghost opened this issue Nov 27, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 27, 2017

i build this project use myget
but IPipeReader,IPipeWriter,IPipe version error
“IPipe”lost“Reading”
“IPipeWriter”lost“Writing”
“IPipeReader”lost“Reading”

Which version should I use, thanks

@mgravell
Copy link
Owner

mgravell commented Nov 27, 2017 via email

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 28, 2017

got it. Thanks.
By the netgain as game gate.but it don't support net core
So I find this repo.

@mgravell
Copy link
Owner

@cathy33 indeed - this is the moral successor to netgain, but is based on experimental in-flight technologies; it has not yet been updated to the current API surface, because when I tried it couldn't complete due to missing APIs. I'm sure it will get there in time - but at the moment this should be considered an incomplete experiment.

@davidfowl
Copy link

Right, the timeline for pipelines is the 2.1 .NET Core release. There are still quite a few API changes coming so we can decide if we want to use this library to help give feedback, or we could wait it out.

@davidfowl
Copy link

Oh, another huge thing that would help this is that we decoupled the http parser from kestrel so that could be used here instead of writing anything custom. It's also already pipelines based.

@mgravell
Copy link
Owner

@davidfowl so: if I try to ringfence some time to pick this back up and have another stab - should I be playing with the kestrel code, or the separate lib code? which is going to be most useful?

@davidfowl
Copy link

davidfowl commented Nov 28, 2017

I think you want to use pieces of kestrel (transport and http parser in particular) without using ASP.NET itself. That will prove that what we have is good. See an example here for using the raw APIs in kestrel (these are subject to change of course):

https://github.com/davidfowl/PlatformLevelTechempower

I would start there and then migrate to the 2.1 APIs from myget. I can help set a frame up if you want 😄

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 28, 2017

Thank you for answering my questions.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Nov 28, 2017
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants