Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

esp8266: Move scan() from esp module to network #1332

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

owens-bill
Copy link
Contributor

Per the suggestion by @pfalcon on PR# 1325, moving the scan method from esp to network. This PR does not include any new code, nor the constants for the various authentication modes.

@owens-bill owens-bill changed the title esp8266: Move scan from esp module to network esp8266: Move scan() from esp module to network Jun 16, 2015
@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Jun 17, 2015

Looks good, will merge when when time permits. Doing it at this pace - one function at time, is just right, thanks @owens-bill !

@dpgeorge
Copy link
Member

+1 from me.

[Note that the debug printf in the scan callback is removed, but I'm ok with that.]

@owens-bill
Copy link
Contributor Author

[Note that the debug printf in the scan callback is removed, but I'm ok with that.]

I figured that if I left that line in, there was at least a 50/50 chance that someone would say, "Why didn't you remove that old commented-out debug printf?" ;)

@dpgeorge
Copy link
Member

old commented-out debug printf

In some cases they are not "old" but are in fact used semi-regularly. This case though is probably not needed anymore so good call removing it :)

@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Jun 17, 2015

Generally, it's better to avoid any other changes when performing a code move.

Merged, thanks.

@pfalcon pfalcon closed this Jun 17, 2015
@owens-bill owens-bill deleted the wifi-scan-move branch June 18, 2015 11:58
tannewt pushed a commit to tannewt/circuitpython that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants