Typo @ UART7_IRQHandler or.. #4597
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Assuming there is always a UART7 when UART8 defined nothing have to change :-)
|
@chrismas9 does this line up with your changes re UART7/8? |
|
I made the same change in the F413 port. It improves readability but makes no change to the code. This is because all STM32 with UART7 also have UART8 and vice versa. I will rebase before submitting the F413 port so you can merge now or wait for F413 (nearly finished testing). |
|
Ok, I've merged this in c9eb7eb |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When assuming there is always an UART7 when there is an UART8 then this can be ignored :-)