Update on NTP_DELTA value in ntptime.py #4661
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The NTP_DELTA value has been changed to reflect the difference described in http://docs.micropython.org/en/v1.9.3/wipy/library/utime.html Before the value was a difference of a whole century which does not seem to have any meaning and looks like it was an unintentional typo.
|
Thanks, but I'm pretty sure it's correct as it is. The NTP timestamp is relative to 1 Jan 1900, and MicroPython's Epoch is relative to 1 Jan 2000, so that's why the number is as it is. |
tannewt
added a commit
to tannewt/circuitpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2021
Issue micropython#4661 - Wrap pulsein values when maxlen is exceeded.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The NTP_DELTA value has been changed to reflect the difference described in http://docs.micropython.org/en/v1.9.3/wipy/library/utime.html
Before the value was a difference of a whole century which does not seem to have any meaning and looks like it was an unintentional typo.