Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Images/wiki imgs dir #652

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Metallicow
Copy link
Contributor

Images dir for wiki/mindmap/3D/etc usage.

Cleaned up from the pdf, alpha and optimized pngs. Can be used for wiki
page also.
For a "Micro"soft Python (Windows) wiki page for tweaks and other OS
specific stuff.
micro.ico: has 16px - 128px bundled images. This is the full
multipurpose desktop ico
micro48.ico: has just 48px size optimized to fit on the pyboard
micro48.png: The optimized png made from vector-logo-3.png

The Autorun.inf customization contents just for reference in commit log
also.
[Autorun]
Icon=micro48.ico
Label=Micro Python
@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Jun 3, 2014

+Images for the micropython wiki pages to link to and for other dev purposes.

These certainly should not live in the source code repository. For hardware stuff, there's separate https://github.com/micropython/pyboard which already has images of the board. So, if these images are solely for wiki usage, it should be hosted elsewhere. Ideally, uploaded into wiki, if it supports that, otherwise, hosted on some server. (Ab)using a git repo to host them would be last choice, and then, it should be a separate repo (so if hosting provider had problems with terms of service compliance for such repo, it killed only it ;-) (just kidding)).

@Metallicow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Umm, Ok that a bit more understandable, a separate resources repo be better for hosting some of the "other stuff" like images for wiki linking/etc. These are for general other stuff.
mindmap, 3D models, animations, images the wikis/tutorials can link to, etc...

I can't make a separate repo, so what would be the best route for stuff like this, so that stuff doesn't get broken(links, etc...) in the future. I'm guessing a "resources/other/misc" named repo maybe.
A place where general community contributions can go, seperate from the "code" repo.

@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Jun 3, 2014

You can create a repo in your account and use that. Once you do maintenance on it and wiki for some reasonable time (e.g. couple of months), it would make sense to talk about transferring it to main account. Otherwise we can end up with bunch of random unmaintained stuff which yet looks like a part of project (and thus leaves mixed impression).

@Metallicow
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess that is an option also...
Well, I guess the next question would be is a regular repo transferable to an organization repo painlessly? so as to cut out all the extra work in transfering stuff. Isn't the wiki stuff separate also(seems to be for each repo(I see you can clone them now))?

Also could the pyboard repo get some actual pics of the shipped v1.0 board top/bottom please. There are no loose pngs(I photoshop extracted them, then optimized em from the pdf), and where is the 3D model used?
It really cuts down duplication of efforts when making something such as 3D renders(yeah I can do that type of stuff too wxBlender) and interactive whatnot(Ex: staple my pyboard to the back of my teddybear and use it to transmit motion capture to blender with help of the accelerometer, I would need a model and images for UV mapping/etc).

@Metallicow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Has anyone checked out this.
https://pages.github.com/

It says each user/organization can have 1 website hosted. It would be perfect for a community type of site everyone can help out with, with various stuff, such as a "wiki" style site.

@dpgeorge
Copy link
Member

dpgeorge commented Jun 4, 2014

Has anyone checked out this...

That looks cool, but we already have wiki.micropython.org that anyone can edit (as well as the github dev wiki, the forum, and the official micropython.org docs...). I don't want to dilute further the web resources, because then people get confused, and information become stale quickly.

@pfalcon
Copy link
Contributor

pfalcon commented Jun 6, 2014

Also ..., and where ... ?

Can you please open separate ticket for these (each), probably in https://github.com/micropython/pyboard , otherwise it's hard to track outstanding issues. (And I guess it may take some time for @dpgeorge to get to these.)

@Metallicow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I made a couple issues on the other repo regarding this one.
Should I make a new pull REQz for the other repo or can you handle moving this one to there easily enough? I guess that might be a git/github feature maybe available...?

@dpgeorge
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the images, but, as @pfalcon says, this repo is not the right place for them. I added an images/ directory to the pyboard repo (and put some photos there), and can add the relvant images from this PR to that directory.

@dpgeorge
Copy link
Member

Renders of the pyboard added to the micropython/pyboard repo. We'll need to find a place for the other pics...

@dpgeorge dpgeorge closed this Aug 10, 2014
tannewt added a commit to tannewt/circuitpython that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2018
QSPI is not currently working so its commented out.

This is progress on micropython#652.
tannewt added a commit to tannewt/circuitpython that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2018
This evolves the API from 2.x (and breaks it). Playback devices are now
separate from the samples themselves. This allows for greater playback
flexibility. Two sample sources are audioio.RawSample and audioio.WaveFile.
They can both be mono or stereo. They can be output to audioio.AudioOut or
audiobusio.I2SOut.

Internally, the dma tracking has changed from a TC counting block transfers
to an interrupt generated by the block event sent to the EVSYS. This reduces
the overhead of each DMA transfer so multiple can occure without using up TCs.

Fixes micropython#652. Fixes micropython#522. Huge progress on micropython#263
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants