Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use public pools for virtual builds #122

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

achamayou
Copy link
Member

Public pools + containers are unfortunately very slow in Pipelines, but this frees up scarce SGX executor resources, so I think it's worth doing.

@achamayou achamayou requested a review from a team June 5, 2019 21:24
@achamayou
Copy link
Member Author

Ignore the CircleCI failures, they will go away once #120 is merged.

@achamayou
Copy link
Member Author

This doesn't seem to work well, for some reason the connection attempts to 127.x.x.x fail:

27: 2019-06-05 21:41:11.648 | INFO | infra.proc:ccall:10 - ./client --host=127.39.200.128 --port=59713 --ca=0.pem startnetwork
27: 2019-06-05 21:41:12.105 | DEBUG | infra.proc:ccall:13 - stdout: Starting network:
27: Underlying transport closed

CircleCI does not suffer from this, so I will transfer the coverage build to the public CI, and add the SAN build either as a separate CircleCI job, or attach it to the public CI directly.

@achamayou achamayou closed this Jun 6, 2019
@achamayou achamayou deleted the use_public_pools_for_virtual_builds branch June 12, 2019 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants