New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #19: Fix Build Status table for changes introduced in Microsoft/ChakraCore#1962 #32
Conversation
Build-Status.md
Outdated
| __Ubuntu 16.04 (x64)<sup>[s]</sup>__ | [![dslow_linux_s_debug][dslow_linux_s_dbgicon]][dslow_linux_s_dbglink] | [![dslow_linux_s_test][dslow_linux_s_testicon]][dslow_linux_s_testlink] | [![dslow_linux_s_release][dslow_linux_s_relicon]][dslow_linux_s_rellink] | | ||
| __Ubuntu 16.04 (x64)<sup>[s][n]</sup>__ | * | [![dslow_linux_sn_test][dslow_linux_sn_testicon]][dslow_linux_sn_testlink] | * | | ||
| __OS X 10.9 (x64)<sup>[a]</sup>__ | [![dslow_osx_a_debug][dslow_osx_a_dbgicon]][dslow_osx_a_dbglink] | [![dslow_osx_a_test][dslow_osx_a_testicon]][dslow_osx_a_testlink] | [![dslow_osx_a_release][dslow_osx_a_relicon]][dslow_osx_a_rellink] | | ||
| __OS X 10.9 (x64)<sup>[s][n]</sup>__ | * | [![dslow_osx_sn_test][dslow_osx_sn_testicon]][dslow_osx_sn_testlink] | * | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a section in the dailies for NoJIT builds already. I wasn't sure if I should split these off or keep the Daily/Slow table consistent with the rolling builds table.
I will make a corresponding change to the README once this is merged. |
👍 |
Seems this fixed the pending OSX build status. |
This is a text-only change to the Wiki. I also updated the required checks for the master branch in the Microsoft/ChakraCore repo settings -- that's what fixed the issue. |
You are right, I entered this PR via link chakra-core/ChakraCore#2634. |
…ed in #1962. Merge pull request #2634 from dilijev:fixbst See #1962 See microsoft/ChakraCore-wiki#32
Ah, I see. FWIW, that's also just a text-only change to the README. The relevant setting was in the GitHub repo metadata/settings, not in our sources. :) |
Fixes #19
See chakra-core/ChakraCore#1962