Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] prefer older binary to new source for R packages on Mac builds (fixes #4008) #4010

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 21, 2021

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR proposes a fix to #4008. The root cause for that issues is that {data.table} recently did a release, but binaries are not available from CRAN yet for it. As a result, the newest version is being compiled from source in CI, and that compilation is failing.

This PR proposes changing the strategy for installing dependencies to "install the newest binary" instead, so that such temporary situations won't disrupt CI and slow development on the entire project in the future.

This reverts the change made in #3876. Since R package builds have to pass for any LightGBM PRs to be merged, I think we should prefer minimizing disruptions even if it means that it takes an extra day or two for our CI to start using the newest version of a dependency.

How I tested this

I tested on my Mac. I could reproduce the original problem and confirm this fixes it.

source install

image

binary install

image

References

Based on the advice in https://community.rstudio.com/t/prefer-install-packages-from-binaries-in-windows/50760.

@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title [ci] prefer older binary to new source for R packages (fixes #4008) [ci] prefer older binary to new source for R packages on Mac builds (fixes #4008) Feb 21, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@StrikerRUS StrikerRUS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ha we cannot win! Now the linux regular job on Azure failed with an issue related to dependencies

/__w/1/s/.ci/test.sh: line 224: jupyter: command not found

Looks like some issue with version conflicts,coming from

conda install -q -y -n $CONDA_ENV ipywidgets notebook
.

Here are the last few lines

notebook -> traitlets[version='>=4.2.1'] -> enum34
attrs -> hypothesis -> enum34
ipywidgets -> traitlets[version='>=4.3.1,<6.0.0'] -> enum34

Package cytoolz conflicts for:
dask -> cytoolz[version='>=0.7.3|>=0.8.2']
distributed -> cytoolz[version='>=0.7.4|>=0.8.2']
dask -> distributed[version='>=2.12.0'] -> cytoolz[version='>=0.7.4']

Package wheel conflicts for:
pip -> wheel
python=3.9 -> pip -> wheel

Package fribidi conflicts for:
graphviz -> pango[version='>=1.42.1,<2.0a0'] -> fribidi[version='>=1.0.2,<2.0a0|>=1.0.5,<2.0a0|>=1.0.9,<2.0a0']
graphviz -> fribidi[version='>=1.0.4,<2.0a0']
pango -> fribidi[version='>=1.0.2,<2.0a0|>=1.0.4,<2.0a0|>=1.0.5,<2.0a0|>=1.0.9,<2.0a0']
python-graphviz -> graphviz -> fribidi[version='>=1.0.4,<2.0a0']

Package scandir conflicts for:
pytest -> pathlib2[version='>=2.2.0'] -> scandir
importlib_metadata -> pathlib2 -> scandir

Package matplotlib-base conflicts for:
matplotlib -> matplotlib-base[version='3.1.2|3.1.2|3.1.2|3.1.3|3.1.3|3.1.3|>=3.2.1,<3.2.2.0a0|>=3.2.2,<3.2.3.0a0|>=3.3.1,<3.3.2.0a0|>=3.3.2,<3.3.3.0a0|>=3.3.4,<3.3.5.0a0',build='py36hef1b27d_1|py38hef1b27d_0|py36hef1b27d_0|py37hef1b27d_0|py38hef1b27d_1|py37hef1b27d_1']
bokeh -> matplotlib -> matplotlib-base[version='3.1.2|3.1.2|3.1.2|3.1.3|3.1.3|3.1.3|>=3.2.1,<3.2.2.0a0|>=3.2.2,<3.2.3.0a0|>=3.3.1,<3.3.2.0a0|>=3.3.2,<3.3.3.0a0|>=3.3.4,<3.3.5.0a0',build='py36hef1b27d_1|py38hef1b27d_0|py36hef1b27d_0|py37hef1b27d_0|py38hef1b27d_1|py37hef1b27d_1']

Package msgpack-python conflicts for:
distributed -> msgpack-python[version='>=0.6.0']
dask -> distributed[version='>=2021.2.0'] -> msgpack-python[version='>=0.6.0']

Package qt conflicts for:
pyqt -> qt[version='5.6.*|5.9.*|>=5.9.7,<5.10.0a0|>=5.9.6,<5.10.0a0|>=5.9.4,<5.10.0a0|>=5.6.3,<5.7.0a0']
matplotlib -> pyqt -> qt[version='5.6.*|5.9.*|>=5.9.7,<5.10.0a0|>=5.9.6,<5.10.0a0|>=5.9.4,<5.10.0a0|>=5.6.3,<5.7.0a0']

Package packaging conflicts for:
bokeh -> packaging[version='>=16.8']
pytest -> packaging
dask -> bokeh[version='>=1.0.0,!=2.0.0'] -> packaging[version='>=16.8']

The full log is too large to copy into this comment, but you can view it at https://dev.azure.com/lightgbm-ci/lightgbm-ci/_build/results?buildId=9297&view=logs&j=c28dceab-947a-5848-c21f-eef3695e5f11.

@StrikerRUS if you're available, could you re-run the failed jobs for this PR on Azure? Since you have permissions (#3819 (comment)) and I don't right now (#3819 (comment)). Sorry to bother you with it :/

@StrikerRUS
Copy link
Collaborator

StrikerRUS commented Feb 21, 2021

Done!
Ahaha, it's getting funny actually!

What CI job will fail next?..

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

that worked, thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the blocking label Aug 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants