chore(deps): update mstest monorepo to v3.4.3

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
MSTest.TestAdapter	3.4.0 -> 3.4.3
MSTest.TestFramework	3.4.0 -> 3.4.3

---

Release Notes

microsoft/testfx (MSTest.TestAdapter)

v3.4.3

See the release notes here

v3.4.2: v.3.4.2

See the release notes here

v3.4.1

See the release notes here

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.3%. Comparing base (e1b4ada) to head (3e98cd7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1160   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   76.3%   76.3%           
=====================================
  Files        256     256           
  Lines      11316   11316           
  Branches    1135    1135           
=====================================
  Hits        8636    8636           
  Misses      2348    2348           
  Partials     332     332           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

• The detector detects more or fewer components than before
• The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
• The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂