Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with using it to benchmark an ERAM RAMDisk #82

Closed
Zero3K opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Issue with using it to benchmark an ERAM RAMDisk #82

Zero3K opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@Zero3K
Copy link

Zero3K commented Nov 28, 2018

When I try to do it, I get the following error:

ERROR: Could not obtain dynamic volume extents (error code: 1)
The file is too small or there has been an error during getting file size
There has been an error during threads execution

The source code and drivers for it can be found at https://github.com/Zero3K/ERAM.

@Zero3K Zero3K changed the title Issue with using it to benchmark an ERAM RAM Disk Issue with using it to benchmark an ERAM RAMDisk Nov 28, 2018
@dl2n
Copy link
Member

dl2n commented Nov 28, 2018 via email

@Zero3K
Copy link
Author

Zero3K commented Nov 28, 2018

I don't see those two functions in its source code. A different version of it did work though. By the way, maybe you could try fixing Zero3K/ERAM#10 and/or Zero3K/ERAM#14.

@Zero3K
Copy link
Author

Zero3K commented Nov 30, 2018

I made a new version of it recently. You can get it at https://github.com/Zero3K/ERAM/releases/tag/v2.24.

@dl2n
Copy link
Member

dl2n commented Dec 1, 2018

I'm citing from the current source on GitHub. If you're using a version of pre-compiled DISKSPD earlier than 2.0.21a (https://aka.ms/diskspd), it is possible something was fixed along the way. Update in any case, or compile from the head of the master branch here.

@dl2n dl2n closed this as completed Jan 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants