Updated the specification around adding foundation components

[janechu]

Pull Request

📖 Description

This update to the specification clarifies adding a "foundation" component with a specific add-foundation-component command.

👩‍💻 Reviewer Notes

Read through and make sure this command makes sense given the add-component command. Since the add-component command deals with adding via templates, the add-foundation-component is intended to explicit to adding foundation based component. This distinction was thought to be necessary as this adds the @microsoft/fast-foundation dependency and begins to use the preconfigured design tokens, so if you are not intending to use those systems, you would simply use the add-component command for your custom components.

✅ Checklist

General

• I have added tests for my changes.
• I have tested my changes.
• I have updated the project documentation to reflect my changes.

⏭ Next Steps

• Add foundation components option #31

[EisenbergEffect]

Seems a bit verbose but otherwise makes sense. At first I wasn't sure about this being a separate command but I think the reasoning is solid. I'm not sure if there's a great way to improve the verbosity.

One thought I had was about related components. For example, if someone adds the accordion, they probably want the accordion-item as well. Could we make an experience improvement at some point so that in cases like this we ask "would you also like to ..."?

[janechu]

Seems a bit verbose but otherwise makes sense. At first I wasn't sure about this being a separate command but I think the reasoning is solid. I'm not sure if there's a great way to improve the verbosity.

One thought I had was about related components. For example, if someone adds the accordion, they probably want the accordion-item as well. Could we make an experience improvement at some point so that in cases like this we ask "would you also like to ..."?

Hm, perhaps I don't include breadcrumb-item, accordion-item etc. due to the fact that they're not meant to be standalone components. That solves both issues. Radio-group is another one that fits along those lines.

Edit: I realize that was unclear, what I mean is you only have the option to add "radio-group" and "breadcrumb" and you would get any sub-components with it.