Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python: Update Planner Jupyter Notebook to feature latest planners #2341

Merged

Conversation

alexchaomander
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

The Python Jupyter notebook for Planners need to be updated to include the latest planners (Sequential and Action)

The BasicPlanner implementation also needed to have a separate Plan class since we now have plan object model. These changes allow for people to still use the BasicPlanner if they want.

@alexchaomander alexchaomander requested review from a team as code owners August 7, 2023 20:41
@shawncal shawncal added python Pull requests for the Python Semantic Kernel samples labels Aug 7, 2023
@awharrison-28 awharrison-28 added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 7861349 Aug 7, 2023
27 checks passed
SOE-YoungS pushed a commit to SOE-YoungS/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
…icrosoft#2341)

### Motivation and Context
The Python Jupyter notebook for Planners need to be updated to include
the latest planners (Sequential and Action)

The `BasicPlanner` implementation also needed to have a separate Plan
class since we now have plan object model. These changes allow for
people to still use the BasicPlanner if they want.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Chao <achao@achao>
Co-authored-by: Abby Harrison <abharris@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Abby Harrison <54643756+awharrison-28@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
python Pull requests for the Python Semantic Kernel
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants