-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the 馃 since we have modes in the go to file #164437
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated change? Will also overlay the banner which I believe is unwanted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jrieken I actually wanted that. because otherwise the command center disappears and it looks weird.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense to my but maybe /cc @daviddossett given emotion with the banner were high. I agree for better looks but I believe the point of the banner is to not be permanent?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I follow鈥攚hat is the effect of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daviddossett so you know we have this banner:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2644648/198129934-fa0e66bc-4478-45b1-9beb-04fa3b8b906e.png)
today, if you have that banner (be in an untrusted workspace) and you launch the command center this happens:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2644648/198130187-9117ed24-676e-455a-a699-609e19fe6d7b.png)
Actually I think that's a bug because really what the code was intending to do, originally, was have the quick pick be under the banner so it didn't cover it basically with the idea that "overlaying anything over the banner is bad"...
My change says "covering the banner for the quick pick is ok" and has the quick pick do what it does today in an untrusted workspace.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think covering it is totally ok personally. It would be strange to decouple the command center button/input from the quick pick itself.
I don't actually see the titlebar element in the second screenshot. Is that intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it is hidden when you click on it since it is often longer than the quickpick itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, got it. In any case I think quick picks should always take priority given their z-index and not be considered part of the normal flow of elements. In other words, they should always be positioned at the very top of the window IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're all in agreement. I'll defer to @jrieken for a re-review