Remove explicit-function-return-type rules #861
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🙌 Thanks for opening this pull request! You're awesome. |
|
Don't mind me closing this PR, @fcole90 . I do appreciate the contribution. It's just that I use the issues and PRs as a kind of a to-do list. Feel free to continue discussion in the original issue. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix
[x] New feature
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Removed rules for explicit-function-return-type
Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?
Fixes #860
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing much, what matters is mostly in the issue and taking a decision about it, rather than in the actual code edit.