Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow S3 gateway to support object locked buckets #13257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2021

Conversation

harshavardhana
Copy link
Member

Description

allow S3 gateway to support object locked buckets

Motivation and Context

  • Supports object locked buckets that require
    PutObject() to set content-md5 always.
  • Use SSE-S3 when S3 gateway is being used instead
    of SSE-KMS for auto-encryption.

How to test this PR?

Nothing special use minio gateway s3 against AWS S3 buckets
with object locking enabled and also auto-encryption setup
on MinIO.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Fixes a regression (If yes, please add commit-id or PR # here)
  • Documentation updated
  • Unit tests added/updated

- Supports object locked buckets that require
  PutObject() to set content-md5 always.
- Use SSE-S3 when S3 gateway is being used instead
  of SSE-KMS for auto-encryption.
@minio-trusted
Copy link
Contributor

Mint Automation

Test Result
mint-large-bucket.sh ✔️
mint-fs.sh ✔️
mint-gateway-s3.sh ✔️
mint-erasure.sh ✔️
mint-dist-erasure.sh ✔️
mint-zoned.sh ✔️
mint-gateway-nas.sh ✔️
mint-compress-encrypt-dist-erasure.sh ✔️
Deleting image on docker hub
Deleting image locally

Copy link
Contributor

@klauspost klauspost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. LGTM

Copy link
Member

@vadmeste vadmeste left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants