Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optimize speedtest for smaller setups #15414

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

harshavardhana
Copy link
Member

Description

optimize speedtest for smaller setups

Motivation and Context

this has been observed in multiple environments
where the setups are small speedtest naturally
fails with default '10s' and the concurrency
of '32' is big for such clusters.

choose a smaller value i.e equal to number of
drives in such clusters and let 'autotune'
increase the concurrency instead.

How to test this PR?

Have a smaller setup and run mc support perf object alias/

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Fixes a regression (If yes, please add commit-id or PR # here)
  • Documentation updated
  • Unit tests added/updated

this has been observed in multiple environments
where the setups are small `speedtest` naturally
fails with default '10s' and the concurrency
of '32' is big for such clusters.

choose a smaller value i.e equal to number of
drives in such clusters and let 'autotune'
increase the concurrency instead.
@minio-trusted
Copy link
Contributor

Mint Automation

Test Result
mint-large-bucket.sh ✔️
mint-fs.sh ✔️
mint-gateway-s3.sh ✔️
mint-erasure.sh ✔️
mint-dist-erasure.sh ✔️
mint-compress-encrypt-dist-erasure.sh ✔️
mint-pools.sh ✔️
Deleting image on docker hub
Deleting image locally

@harshavardhana harshavardhana merged commit cbd70d2 into minio:master Jul 27, 2022
@harshavardhana harshavardhana deleted the choose-concurrency branch July 27, 2022 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants